This review contains mild spoilers.
“Give me a girl at an impressionable age and she is mine for life.”
Title: The Prime of Miss Jean Brody
Author: Muriel Spark
Year: 1961
Through the eyes of Sandy, Rose, Jenny, Monica, Eunice
and Mary, the character of Jean Brodie is introduced. She was their teacher all
throughout their teenage years. A remarkable teacher, one they will never
forget. At first this seems to be because of her strange way of teaching, not
bothering with the curriculum at all. The six girls were also Miss Brodie’s
favourite which meant they were invited to all sorts of activities outside of
school. As a reader our insights grow along with the girls, and as they get
older, they become aware of their teacher’s strange behaviour, manipulations,
and fascist ideas.
Spark based the character of Miss Brodie on her own
teacher, Christine Kay, “a fiercely independent Edinburgh school ma’am,
determined to tell her charges all about life’s pleasures, rather than teach
them the boring curriculum” (Roberts). The character of Sandy represented Spark
herself, who was obsessed with her teachers’ personal life (Roberts).
The novel starts out whimsical and cute, both in plot
and in writing style. The former in the sense that the children are so excited
and loving towards their teacher as well as the other way around. The writing
style fits in this due to the comical repetitiveness, mostly when people are
introduced, and later described again as if they had never occurred before.
Moreover, the title of the novel is constantly emphasised – Miss Brodie was in
her prime. This, unfortunately, became too repetitive, to the point of annoyance.
This style changes, though, just as the plot does. It turns darker and darker
as we learn about Brodie’s secret agenda as well as Sandy’s betrayal. This
makes for an engaging dynamic between style and plot.
Another interesting shift takes place, namely one in
focal point. The character all action revolves around throughout the first part
of the novel is Miss Brodie. Around two thirds of the novel, the focus turns to
Sandy and it turns into a story about her unmasking of the teacher. At that
point the novel transforms into a much more difficult and layered piece of
literature. The reader is pro Miss Brodie, not fully aware of her faults just
yet. Sandy is despised as her actions seem solely driven by jealousy. As a
consequence of the shift, though, these ideas are juggled and shaken. The real
importance of the story becomes clear and one is left feeling cheated. Just
like the Brodie set.
All these changes in the story made me want to read
the story again, right after I finished it, trying to see if I could read the
novel trying to detect all unethical aspects to Miss Brodie’s teaching, and
this way allowing me to be more judgemental towards her. This is what Judy Suh
also addresses in her study of the novel, and she states that “the novel does
not as a result of featuring such a magnetic character posit the impossibility
of judgement” (87). While presently I cannot fully agree with this statement
for as I said before, I feel the novel tricked me into liking Miss Brodie too
much, but I am interesting to see how I would view her the second time around.
No comments:
Post a Comment